Sunday, January 28, 2018

What are ramifications to FBI presenting fraudulent application information to a FISA Judge, gaining fraudulent surveillance authority, and then using the outcomes of that surveillance in the courtroom of the approving FISA judge - against the accused target of the warrant?









8. What are the rules of FISA-702 approvals, and who grants them, in federal cases where the subsequent FISA warrant leads to a prosecution and the same FISA Judge is the trial judge? What are the ethics rules?

9. What are ramifications to FBI presenting fraudulent application information to a FISA Judge, gaining fraudulent surveillance authority, and then using the outcomes of that surveillance in the courtroom of the approving FISA judge - against the accused target of the warrant?



11. These are all just general questions that stem from Contreras conceding to a conflict, but doing so only AFTER the first administrative hearing on the case.

12. If the conflict existed on December 7th 2017, such that a recusal was needed, would not that same conflict have existed on December 1st, 2017 ?