Obama couldn't unilaterally change the definition of gun dealers, so he's just decided to lie to the public about what constitutes dealing.
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) January 5, 2016
“Under your leadership we do need guns to keep us safe.” @TomiLahren has a scathing message for @POTUS:
https://t.co/5jhnU3nq1D
— TheBlaze (@theblaze) January 5, 2016
President Obama Has Let His Emotion Get the Better of His Judgment https://t.co/DadeIOhgiC pic.twitter.com/2lC0ihkXVw
— National Review (@NRO) January 5, 2016
Has Obama lost his mind? This is a man, remember, who is supposed to be admirably dispassionate; a man who is supposed to understand how the game is played; a man who is supposed to reflexively refuse to be taken in by the emotion of the moment. And yet he’s going to use a good deal of his last year’s political capital in order to tweak a few minor rules around the edges? Why? Even if we’re generous and presume that every single one of these regulations finds its way permanently into the law, he will nevertheless have done nothing substantial to further “universal background checks”; he will have instituted none of his coveted magazine limits; and he will have banned none of the weapons that he disdains. Further, he will have set no meaningful precedents whatsoever. In other words: Even if he wins this round, he will have done precisely nothing of merit — except perhaps to have pleased his base and to have convinced the most ignorant parts of the electorate that he has finally stuck his finger into the NRA’s eye. Were these serious measures, I would be squealing. Instead, I’m amused. These are the dampest of squibs.
Which is to say that Obama’s behavior is not at all rational. As far as I can see, the president has announced these initiatives for no other reason than to satisfy his burning desire to say that he did “something” to advance gun control. That he in fact did nothing of note is neither here nor there. He needs the applause line — both now, and in his retirement — and he’s determined to get it.
When I say he did “nothing of note,” of course, I mean “nothing of note to advance his agenda.” As it happens, the president has done something “of note” tonight: He has hurt his own side. Were I a gun control advocate I’d be livid with him. Livid.
@seanmdav Maybe I'm too cynical - but I'm pretty sure President Obama has a good idea of what constitutes dealing pic.twitter.com/1tTDT9xljK
— Ralph Kramden (@ExposeThePump) January 5, 2016
President Obama’s Action on New Federal Gun Restrictions To Be Announced Tomorrow… https://t.co/CRLTnCYrq9 pic.twitter.com/u41j9ZKdJQ
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) January 5, 2016
Obama's gun EA issued tonight is tantamount to saying, "If you want your gun you can keep your gun, but you can't sell it unless ur an FFL"
— Kerry Picket (@KerryPicket) January 5, 2016
The NRA on the president's gun control plan. "This is it? Really?" https://t.co/QoUgszeqnG pic.twitter.com/h5WRPIOvUX
— Binyamin Appelbaum (@BCAppelbaum) January 5, 2016
Tweet of the Day, The Gun Control Executive Order Nothingburger edition.: https://t.co/FZtNq9iG3t
— Moe Lane (@moelane) January 5, 2016
President to seek funding for additional 200 ATF agents to enforce gun reforms https://t.co/AZq9ZdyiEw
— TwitchyTeam (@TwitchyTeam) January 5, 2016
Gun sales soar after Obama calls for new restrictions https://t.co/qsDoJ2UG2d pic.twitter.com/2G6TCMAxHO
— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 5, 2016
'Thanks, Obama'! POTUS' efforts backfire; Smith & Wesson's business is BOOMING https://t.co/mwMowLQsjk
— TwitchyTeam (@TwitchyTeam) January 4, 2016