whoopsie pic.twitter.com/c9feW5rJbD
— Andrew Stiles (@AndrewStilesUSA) May 14, 2015
#BREAKING: George Stephanopoulos discloses $50,000 contribution to Clinton Foundation
http://t.co/T7hscMjUSA pic.twitter.com/vKOQxL0xBG
— Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) May 14, 2015
By "discloses" you mean "was busted by Free Beacon and tried to get ahead of the scandal," right? https://t.co/PUQipVNoLj
— Instapundit.com (@instapundit) May 14, 2015
"Clinton Cash" author slams "massive" ethics breach of Stephanopoulos donation: http://t.co/ENxY5KizND pic.twitter.com/9gFsLJDmyp
— The Hill (@thehill) May 14, 2015
Stephanopoulos donated $50K to Clinton Foundation: ‘I apologize’ for non-disclosure http://t.co/8DfjALwWp0 via @FreeBeacon #politics #ABC
— The Washington Times (@WashTimes) May 14, 2015
George Stephanopoulos discloses $50,000 contribution to Clinton Foundation
http://t.co/43jv9f8Bg8 not disclosed when reporting on it
— Andrew Kaczynski (@BuzzFeedAndrew) May 14, 2015
Shouldn't the $50K disclosure have at least come before this? http://t.co/o9bPeBgz2G
— Matt Lewis (@mattklewis) May 14, 2015
◼ Stephanopoulos gave $50,000 to Clinton Foundation, didn’t disclose during coverage of scandal; ABC News: “Honest mistake”; Update: Other coverage without disclosure from 2013, 2014; Update: Two weeks ago, too - Ed Morrissey/HotAir
Remember when George Stephanopoulos declared during an interview with Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer that the book had found no “smoking gun” against the Clinton Foundation and the Clintons themselves?
...Let’s recall the exchange between Stephanopoulos and Schweizer:
STEPHANOPOULOS: As you know, the Clinton campaign says you haven’t produced a shred of evidence that there was any official action as secretary that — that supported the interests of donors.Gee, maybe that would have been a good time to add, “Just to be clear, I’ve donated $50,000 to the Clinton Foundation,” for the sake of honesty.
SCHWEIZER: Well…
STEPHANOPOULOS: We’ve done investigative work here at ABC News, found no proof of any kind of direct action. And an independent government ethics expert, Bill Allison, of the Sunline Foundation (ph), wrote this. He said, “There’s no smoking gun, no evidence that she changed the policy based on donations to the foundation.”
No smoking gun.
Is there a smoking gun?
SCHWEIZER: Yes. The smoking gun is in the pattern of behavior. And here’s the analogy I would give you. It’s a little bit like insider trading. I wrote a book on Congressional insider trading a couple of years ago and talked with prosecutors.
Most people that engage in criminal insider trading don’t send an e-mail that says I’ve got inside information, buy this stock.
The way they look at it, they look at a pattern of stock trades. If the person has access to that information and they do a series of well-timed trades, that warrants investigation.
I think the same thing applies here.
By the way, what’s important to note is it was confirmed on Thursday, both by “The New York Times” and “The Wall Street Journal,” that there were multi-million dollar, non-disclosed donations that were made to the Clinton Foundation that were never disclosed by the Clintons.
This is a direct breach of an agreement they signed with the White House.
STEPHANOPOULOS: That — that is an issue for them, but it’s not a criminal — it’s nothing that would warrant a criminal investigation.
ABC’s Stephanopoulos gave $50G to Clinton Foundation without disclosing it via @foxnewspolitics http://t.co/JHFuHev5YI
— Fox News (@FoxNews) May 14, 2015
As @seanmdav notes, it's not just that Stephanopoulos covers the Clintons; he's specifically defended the Foundation. http://t.co/4M9oXnhjyq
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) May 14, 2015
.@GStephanopoulos Hedges on Hillary Scandal: 'This Is a Tough One' http://t.co/5hfC6jXulO
— C J Warner (@CJWarner1) May 3, 2015
SuperCut Video: By George: ABC’s Clinton Defender-in-Chief http://t.co/BNYW4SBRfl via @DavidRutz https://t.co/MRt8qyX2Ar
— Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) May 14, 2015
Peter Schweizer “stunned” Stephanopoulos didn't disclose Clinton Foundation donations during interview: http://t.co/yngyVRXgQ7
— Michael Calderone (@mlcalderone) May 14, 2015
He honestly thought no one would find out. https://t.co/lP7waIUFI6
— Instapundit.com (@instapundit) May 14, 2015
Clinton Ca$h Author Shreds Disgraced ABC Hack Stephanopoulos: “Massive Breach of Ethical Standards’ http://t.co/4LwUAMrUXV
cc; @rickklein
— JWF (@JammieWF) May 14, 2015
Cortney O'Brien - Even George Stephanopoulos Can’t Ignore Clinton Donor Scandal http://t.co/9AX1JtH1ms
— Ian Cone (@conens46) May 1, 2015
Why risk your career to hide your donation? Were you under duress? Coming clean is the best way to deal with blackmail. @GStephanopoulos
— Film Ladd (@FilmLadd) May 14, 2015
Last point is what gets me: Have Clinton beat reporters not looked into foundation donors? Or did they just not care about Stephanopoulos?
— T. Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) May 14, 2015
Like the Clinton tapes, all credit goes to @FreeBeacon for the Stephanopoulos find. No one else even looked. All others are copying.
— T. Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) May 14, 2015
GOP: Stephanopoulos should sit out 2016 http://t.co/huymPApK4z pic.twitter.com/P4cp5bZs4h
— The Hill (@thehill) May 14, 2015