Loretta Lynch has seized over $110,000,000 without due process using civil asset theft. Click to #StopLynch: http://t.co/xYH7J5piTA
— Senator Rand Paul (@SenRandPaul) March 19, 2015
Gun rights groups rally against Loretta Lynch confirmation: http://t.co/GSgzeanmp6 pic.twitter.com/U7Mt4etdo6
— The Hill (@thehill) March 19, 2015
McCain: Sen. Durbin, who says GOP making Loretta Lynch “sit in the back of the bus” held up Rogers Brown nomination for years.
— Dale Randolph (@PeepNuggets) March 19, 2015
Dick Durbin accuses GOP of putting Lynch in back of bus but threw Condi Rice under bus when he voted against her. http://t.co/PRMwkBJ8L4 …
— Crystal Wright (@GOPBlackChick) March 18, 2015
No #LorettaLynch Just NO!!! MT "@maricopakellyk: pic.twitter.com/DpJ3EDd0Gn” @JeffFlake
— Mark Schumacher (@MSchumacher) March 14, 2015
.@TedCruz: “No senator who takes his or her oath of office seriously shld vote to confirm" #LorettaLynch http://t.co/AkyZqNTiZU #tcot
— ForAmerica (@ForAmerica) March 17, 2015
Sen @TedCruz Ted Cruz reminds us how awful Loretta Lynch really is http://t.co/AkyZqNTiZU
— ForAmerica (@ForAmerica) March 12, 2015
When asked whether she would defend President Obama’s illegal executive amnesty—which Obama himself acknowledged, 22 times, he had no authority to undertake and which a federal court has just enjoined as unlawful—she responded affirmatively, saying that she thought the Administration’s contrived legal justification was “reasonable.”
When asked the limits of “prosecutorial discretion,” the dubious theory President Obama has put forth to justify his executive amnesty, she could give none.
When asked if it would allow the President to extend amnesty to all 12 million people here illegally … she refused to answer…
When asked if she agreed with the Holder Justice Department’s view (also rejected unanimously by the U.S. Supreme Court) that the First Amendment gives no protection whatsoever to a church’s or synagogue’s choice of pastor or rabbi … she refused to answer.
When asked at her hearing if she believed the federal government could employ a drone to kill a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil, if that citizen posed no imminent threat … she refused to answer.
And when asked if she would be willing to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the IRS’s targeting of citizens for their political views—a prosecutor who was not a major Obama donor, as is the current lawyer leading the “investigation” … she refused to answer.
◼ Republicans must oppose Loretta Lynch—or lose all credibility on lawlessness - TED CRUZ/POLITICO
Exclusive — Scott Walker: Loretta Lynch ‘Not Fit To Serve’ As Attorney General - Breitbart http://t.co/7RWd24251c via @BreitbartNews
— TIMENOUT (@TIMENOUT) March 14, 2015
.@SenateMajLdr We can survive without an AG. We can't survive without the #RuleOfLaw NO #LorettaLynch @DRW20 @smartvalueblog
— Mark Schumacher (@MSchumacher) March 13, 2015