New York Times ONLY tolerates Protests on behalf of Thugs and Criminals such as Michael Brown and Eric Garner

◼ What does the NYTimes have to say when New York Police give silent protest to nutjob Mayor Bill de Blasio in the form of a silent protest or a mild heckle? “These are disgraceful acts” says the NYTimes. Ha, ain’t that RICH? - Femisex

The CRAZY Times says such peaceful protesting by police demonstrates a “snarling sense of victimhood that seems to be motivating the anti-de Blasio campaign...” Nevermind the fact the de Blasio (aka Big Bird) has slapped and slapped at police since he took office and…even in the face of the cold-blooded execution of two NYPD, Big Birdy boiled mad when it is suggested the anti-cop protests spurred those murders....

Now compare and contrast the Times hateful anti-cop op-ed to their loving tribute to the not-silent, and wholly disruptive protests the tangled the streets of New York by those who protested the fact that two men--who were clearly breaking the law and resisting arrest—died because of their own actions, aggression in one case, resistance in the other:

To that the Times says:

Those protesters “showed a vivid grasp of symbolism.” And despite the fact of oft occurring chants of wanting to see dead cops, the CRAZY NYTimes called those protests a form of “peaceable dissent that lent credibility and potency to their demands.”