Friday, August 30, 2013

Show of Farce


Kerry's Syria Speech: All Emotion, No Mission Plan, and The POTUS is Backing Away (Includes Full Transcript) - Yid With Lid
John Kerry: We Will Not Repeat Iraq Moment - - Susan Crabtree/Washington Examiner
Obama no longer commands respect - Jennifer Rubin/Washington Post

DRUDGE HEADLINES:
KERRY'S MOMENT... - Jonathan Allen/Politico
Syria says US evidence 'entirely fabricated'... - France24
UN analysis of samples could take two weeks... - Reuters
WHITE HOUSE PISSED AT LEAKS... - Glenn Thrush/Politico
Experts: Don't bomb chemical weapon sites... - AP
U.S. turns on Britain... - New York Times
Cameron first to lose war vote in Parliament since 1782! - Reuters
'Embarrassing'... - NYT
FLASHBACK: Assad hosts Pelosi in Damascus... - NBC
Obama 'not made any decisions'... - Reid J. Epstein/Politico
Willing to go it alone... - NYT
PENTAGON CAN'T AFFORD WAR; MUST SEEK ADDITIONAL FUNDS - Washington Free Beacon
SYRIA MOVES MISSILES, TROOPS... - Reuters

LUCIANNE HEADLINES:
Obama´s Blundering Incompetence - Michael Reagan/Townhall
The Audacity of the Haughty - Rush Limbaugh
Frustrated Obama: I won´t be ‘paralyzed’ on Syria - Yahoo News, by Oliver Knox
In Syria, U.S. goal ´not to get mocked´ - Orange County Register (Ca), by Mark Steyn
Show of Farce - Wall Street Journal, by James Taranto
Barack Obama is proving an embarrassing amateur on the world stage compared to George W. Bush - Nile Gardiner/Telegraph
What Is the Point of a Syrian Intervention? - Victor Davis Hanson/National Review
If our attitude is that Obama screwed up, but that now the least-screwed-up remedy is to attack Syria, then we are indeed in bad shape.

Of the bad and worse alternatives, the worse is attacking without specifying our aims, means, and desired results. Yet to do so would convince Obama to drop the idea.

If the objective is to weaken Assad without empowering al-Qaeda-like Islamists, then non-intervention serves that goal far better.

If the objective is to destroy WMD depots, and send a global lesson that they are taboo, where are they and how are we to take them out? And what of the irony that Assad is probably no worse a custodian of WMD than is the opposition that we would de facto aiding?

If the point is to save face after the empty rhetorical redlines, then at this late date a few hours of cruise missiles will be interpreted by those who count — Russia, Iran, China, North Korea — as a half-serious and pathetic attempt to restore credibility....
Obama: Syria ´a challenge to the world´ - Reid J. Epstein/Politico
Obama: No final decision on Syria, considering ‘a limited, narrow act’ - Washington Times, by Dave Boyer


´The British aren´t coming!´: US media mock Cameron´s failure to deliver on promise to back Obama in strikes against Syria - Daily Mail [UK], by Matt Chorley
Nancy Pelosi the hawk tells President Obama to act on Syria - Jonathan Allen & Jake Sherman/Politico
Sen. Rand Paul: Obama interested in ‘saving face’ on Syria - Seth McLaughlin/Washington Times (D.C)
Why a nervous Hillary Clinton is remarkably silent on Syria - Nile Gardiner/Telegraph
U.S. intelligence: Syrian government undertook deadly chemical attack - Ken Dilanian/LA Times
Hollande says France is ‘ready’ to act against Syria; Kerry makes statement on situation - Anthony Faiola/Washington Post
(Headline appears to have changed to: John Kerry makes forceful case for U.S. military intervention in Syria)
5 Ways Obama’s Unseriousness Has Been Exposed by Syria Strike Chatter - Bryan Preston /PJMedia
1. Failure to consult Congress.
2. Failure to get buy-in from the American people.
3. No draft language for the UN to consider.
4. No military plan, no clear objective.
5. Lack of credible spokes men and women to obtain buy-in from the American people and the press.
10 Things Everyone Needs To Understand About A Military Strike In Syria - John Schindler/Business Insider

MORE:
Obama’s Absurd Pseudo Intelligence on Syria - Larry Johnson/No Quarter
FOR IT AND AGAINST IT - Sultan Knish



LATEST: Obama Discusses Possibilities of "Limited, Narrow" Act in Syria - IJ Review



OBAMA PROMISES SYRIA STRIKE WILL HAVE NO OBJECTIVE - The New Yorker
“It may take twenty-four hours, but it could also take twelve,” Mr. Carney said.

“Maybe we get in there, take a look around, and get out right away. But however long it takes, one thing will not change: this mission will have no point. The President is resolute about that.”