◼ Anthony Weiner's wife wants to reassure us. Don't trust her. - Robin Abcarian/LA Times
◼ New York Post cover dubs Huma ‘Señora Danger’ - Charlie Spiering/Washington Examiner @charlesspiering
◼ On and on it goes, with a string of CNN parrots squawking in unison about Huma's intelligence, bravery, and uncanny similarity to Hillary Clinton, whose playbook she seems to keep under her pillow. (It gives her something to read while Carlos Danger is in the bathroom with his cell phone and a bottle of hand lotion.) - John Hayward/Human Events @Doc_o
Meanwhile, a few churlish souls like Andrew McCarthy at National Review find it grimly amusing that all these talking heads are wondering why the spectacular Huma Abedin would remain married to the odious Weiner, and even lie to protect him. There are a couple of very obvious reasons, one of which is the huge amount of taxpayer money the Democrat power elite conspires to tuck into Huma's pockets. Did you know she gets $135,000 a year from the State Department scandal factory, even though she gets to work from New York, and also works as a "strategic consultant" for a company run by a Bill Clinton crony? Admire her sharp wardrobe, tax serfs; you paid for it. We can't cut a single nickel from government spending without pulling cops off the street, but we absolutely must give Huma Abedin $135,000 in walking-around money every year, because her other cushy job doesn't pay well enough to keep her in the ruling-class style to which she has become accustomed.
The other reason McCarthy mentions is the one you are absolutely not supposed to talk about, ever. It's basically been written into the Constitution by the Beltway establishment, a phantom amendment that says "no American shall discuss how well the Muslim Brotherhood has done under the Obama Administration, or Huma Abedin's connections to it."
◼ Why Democrat Women Stick By Their Creeps - Jim Geraghty/National Review
