Thursday, July 21, 2011
Scheffler: Include Palin, Perry in straw poll
◼ Republican National Committee member Steve Scheffler e-mailed me this morning to say that he’ll be “lobbying hard” to include Texas Gov. Rick Perry and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin on the Iowa Republican Straw Poll ballot. - Kathie Obradovich/DesMoinesRegister.com
◼ Candidates will watch this Iowa debate - Kathie Obradovich/DesMoinesRegister.com
Six presidential candidates (Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Thaddeus McCotter, Tim Pawlenty and Rick Santorum) spent $15,000 each for the privilege of speaking at the Iowa Republican Party’s Ames straw poll and reserving space for their supporters. On Saturday, the GOP state central committee will decide which of the other candidates, who haven’t paid a penny, will get their names on the ballot, too.... Should announced candidates who have chosen not to buy space for the straw poll — Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman and Newt Gingrich, for example — get a spot on the ballot?
◼ Candidates will watch this Iowa debate - Kathie Obradovich/DesMoinesRegister.com
Six presidential candidates (Ron Paul, Michele Bachmann, Herman Cain, Thaddeus McCotter, Tim Pawlenty and Rick Santorum) spent $15,000 each for the privilege of speaking at the Iowa Republican Party’s Ames straw poll and reserving space for their supporters. On Saturday, the GOP state central committee will decide which of the other candidates, who haven’t paid a penny, will get their names on the ballot, too.... Should announced candidates who have chosen not to buy space for the straw poll — Mitt Romney, Jon Huntsman and Newt Gingrich, for example — get a spot on the ballot?
A Democratic polling firm said President Obama's already weak job-approval numbers are "worse than they appear" and he likely would lose the election if it were held today.
◼ Worse for Mr. Obama, PPP said, the "vast majority" of undecideds disapprove of the president's performance. - Washington Times
◼ The Horserace for July 21, 2011 - Redstate
Washington Examiner Editorial: Gang of Six plan is more smoke and mirrors... written in secret, with no public record of its deliberations or who participated in its creation
◼ Gang of Six plan is more smoke and mirrors - Washington Examiner Editorial
(I)s it too much to ask our esteemed lions of the Fourth Estate toiling in the White House Press Corps to at least ask the president why he opposes a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget and a supermajority in both chambers of Congress to raise taxes?
Like President Obama's disastrous $859 billion economic stimulus package and the Obamacare "reform" he and Democratic leaders rammed through Congress last year, the Go6 plan unveiled Tuesday was written in secret, with no public record of its deliberations or who participated in its creation. But the Go6 plan does offer one thing of value -- it reminds us that Washington's professional politicians thrive behind closed doors.◼ Editorial: Gang Of Six Plan: A $3.1 Tril Tax Hike - Investor's Business Daily
National Debt: No wonder President Obama has so heartily endorsed the "Gang of Six" deficit plan. Just like everything Obama has offered so far, it's short on details and long on tax hikes.◼ Why is Gang of Six plan "practical" but Cut, Cap and Balance will never pass? - Mark Tapscott/Washington Examiner
Soon after the "Gang of Six" — a bipartisan group of senators that has been trying for months to put together a deficit reduction plan — issued its new proposal, President Obama praised it as "a very significant step" that represents "the potential for bipartisan consensus."
What it really represents is Washington at its worst.
The "plan" Obama was praising isn't a plan at all, but a few pages of bullet points with vague concepts, promises of future cuts, and confusing, and at times contradictory, numbers...
According to the outline, the $1.5 trillion in "tax relief" is how the Congressional Budget Office would score the plan.
But what the gang conveniently leaves out is that the CBO's forecast has $4.6 trillion in tax hikes already baked into it. That's because the CBO baseline assumes all the Bush tax cuts get repealed, that every other temporary tax cut is left to expire, and that the alternative minimum tax continues to entrap millions more middle-class families each year.
Once you take that into account, the $1.5 trillion in "tax relief" turns instead into a $3.1 trillion tax increase over the next decade..
(I)s it too much to ask our esteemed lions of the Fourth Estate toiling in the White House Press Corps to at least ask the president why he opposes a constitutional amendment requiring a balanced budget and a supermajority in both chambers of Congress to raise taxes?
Barack Obama's 2008 bundlers flee political 'machine'
◼ Campaign officials deny that there’s any “enthusiasm gap” - Politico
When Sen. Barack Obama began running for president in 2007, a small handful of determined, inspired supporters found a new political calling. A new group of professionals — from a San Juan jewelry store owner to a West Coast biotech executive — raised hundreds of thousands of dollars each for him and their “bundling” was crucial in helping Obama offset Hillary Clinton’s profound financial and institutional advantages.
Four years later, many of those new bundlers say they won’t be coming back. For reasons ranging from disillusion and dissatisfaction to an overriding sense that the once idealistic Obama crusade has become yet another soulless political behemoth, that inspired cadre of early Obama supporters has largely been replaced by professional Democratic Party operatives.... Read the rest
When Sen. Barack Obama began running for president in 2007, a small handful of determined, inspired supporters found a new political calling. A new group of professionals — from a San Juan jewelry store owner to a West Coast biotech executive — raised hundreds of thousands of dollars each for him and their “bundling” was crucial in helping Obama offset Hillary Clinton’s profound financial and institutional advantages.
Four years later, many of those new bundlers say they won’t be coming back. For reasons ranging from disillusion and dissatisfaction to an overriding sense that the once idealistic Obama crusade has become yet another soulless political behemoth, that inspired cadre of early Obama supporters has largely been replaced by professional Democratic Party operatives.... Read the rest
As debt talks intensify, Obama opens door to short-term deal to buy more time
◼ The contentious budget talks that have dominated Washington for months intensified Wednesday, prompting President Obama to say he would accept a short-term hike in the debt ceiling if it gave lawmakers time to finalize a comprehensive deal.. - Washington Post
The contentious budget talks that have dominated Washington for months intensified Wednesday, prompting President Obama to say he would accept a short-term hike in the debt ceiling if it gave lawmakers time to finalize a comprehensive deal.
Obama had pledged to veto any short-term measure, but White House spokesman Jay Carney said Wednesday that the president could accept an extension of “a few days” if it allowed a long-term deficit-reduction and debt-ceiling deal to work its way through Congress.
◼ WH's Carney: Obama May Accept A Short-Term Debt Ceiling Deal- Real Clear Politics
◼ PREDICTION: HOW THE DEBT DEBATE WILL UNFOLD - Dick Morris
The contentious budget talks that have dominated Washington for months intensified Wednesday, prompting President Obama to say he would accept a short-term hike in the debt ceiling if it gave lawmakers time to finalize a comprehensive deal.
Obama had pledged to veto any short-term measure, but White House spokesman Jay Carney said Wednesday that the president could accept an extension of “a few days” if it allowed a long-term deficit-reduction and debt-ceiling deal to work its way through Congress.
◼ WH's Carney: Obama May Accept A Short-Term Debt Ceiling Deal- Real Clear Politics
◼ PREDICTION: HOW THE DEBT DEBATE WILL UNFOLD - Dick Morris
The tweets fly at first-ever GOP Twitter debate
◼ Six Republican presidential candidates participated in a tea-party sponsored debate on Twitter on Wednesday — and the results showed both the promise and the limits of the social medium. - LA Times
The format allowed the six, Reps. Michele Bachmann and Thaddeus McCotter, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, ex-Sen. Rick Santorum, former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, and businessman Herman Cain, to interact directly with supporters and detractors — and allowed their respective messages to be relayed and retweeted across the ever-expanding platform.....
It took awhile to get going, as well, as each candidate laboriously pounded out an abbreviated opening statement. Thirty-five minutes into the event, not a single question had been asked.
After that, the candidates answered a series of broad questions, largely signaling their similar positions with respect to repealing the Democratic healthcare overhaul, reducing regulatory burdens on business, and cutting government spending.
The format allowed the six, Reps. Michele Bachmann and Thaddeus McCotter, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, ex-Sen. Rick Santorum, former New Mexico Gov. Gary Johnson, and businessman Herman Cain, to interact directly with supporters and detractors — and allowed their respective messages to be relayed and retweeted across the ever-expanding platform.....
It took awhile to get going, as well, as each candidate laboriously pounded out an abbreviated opening statement. Thirty-five minutes into the event, not a single question had been asked.
After that, the candidates answered a series of broad questions, largely signaling their similar positions with respect to repealing the Democratic healthcare overhaul, reducing regulatory burdens on business, and cutting government spending.
Obama in perilous shape
◼ Obama's approval rating this month is 46% with 48% of voters disapproving of him. - PPP's monthly national poll on the 2012 Presidential race
There are 2 things particularly troubling in his numbers: independents split against him by a 44/49 margin, and 16% of Democrats are unhappy with the job he's doing while only 10% of Republicans give him good marks. Republicans dislike him at this point to a greater extent than Democrats like him and that will be a problem for him moving forward if it persists.
◼ Liberal Pollster Declares Obama's Re-election in Trouble - Yid With Lid
Gallup is also showing a drop in support for Obama, the three-day rolling average of presidential approval reflected that Obama's approval dropped to 42%, to put that into perspective one month ago that approval rating was at 49%.
Since it is a three day average, and the first day a drop has been detected, tomorrow's Gallup numbers for Obama may be even worse.
Rasmussen's three-day average reflects a similar drop with the President's disapproval at 54% vs 44% approval.
What is forcing Obama's numbers down? That could be best answered with the now-famous phrase, "Its the economy stupid!"
There are 2 things particularly troubling in his numbers: independents split against him by a 44/49 margin, and 16% of Democrats are unhappy with the job he's doing while only 10% of Republicans give him good marks. Republicans dislike him at this point to a greater extent than Democrats like him and that will be a problem for him moving forward if it persists.
◼ Liberal Pollster Declares Obama's Re-election in Trouble - Yid With Lid
Gallup is also showing a drop in support for Obama, the three-day rolling average of presidential approval reflected that Obama's approval dropped to 42%, to put that into perspective one month ago that approval rating was at 49%.
Since it is a three day average, and the first day a drop has been detected, tomorrow's Gallup numbers for Obama may be even worse.
Rasmussen's three-day average reflects a similar drop with the President's disapproval at 54% vs 44% approval.
What is forcing Obama's numbers down? That could be best answered with the now-famous phrase, "Its the economy stupid!"
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Obama summons DEMOCRATS to White House for debt-ceiling meeting
◼ President Barack Obama is summoning top Democrats from the House and Senate to the White House Wednesday afternoon for talks on raising the nation’s debt ceiling.
White House spokesman Jay Carney says the meeting will take place shortly before 3 p.m. EDT. When asked why Obama was not meeting with Republicans, Carney would only say there were no other meetings to announce. - FORBES
◼ Obama summons Democrats to WH for debt-ceiling meeting - HotAir
White House spokesman Jay Carney says the meeting will take place shortly before 3 p.m. EDT. When asked why Obama was not meeting with Republicans, Carney would only say there were no other meetings to announce. - FORBES
◼ Obama summons Democrats to WH for debt-ceiling meeting - HotAir
Paul Ryan: Cut, Cap & Balance the Budget; Grow the Economy; Save this Country
"Leading on reporters is not leadership"
◼ House Republicans pass symbolic measure on debt ceiling - LA Times
The legislation calls for a cap on spending and a constitutional amendment to balance the budget. It is likely to die in the Senate. President Obama says time is running out for 'actually solving this problem.'
◼
Congratulations To House Republicans For Standing Up For Middle America - Strata-Sphere
Sacrifice this time begins at the top. State government across the nation have been able to cut back and produce modest surpluses. It is not impossible or devastating as the left moans constantly. Now is the time to stand up for a historic rescue.
Issa camp says Washington Post wrong on Gunrunner story
◼ A spokesman for Rep. Darrell Issa, California Republican and the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, told The Daily Caller that the Washington Post is the only news organization to bite on new misleading sentiments from the Justice Department. - Yahoo
That part of his statement walks through how the Wall Street Journal had already debunked the meme, too. “The April 2010 ATF briefing on weapons smuggling by criminal cartels included a staff member of the Democratic staff of the Oversight Committee who has been working for Ranking Member Cummings on the Fast and Furious investigation,” the part of Hill’s statement to the Post that its reporters ignored read. “This Democratic staff member has never indicated to Republican staff that he had any prior awareness of the gunwalking that took place in Operation Fast and Furious and the recollections of Republican staff who attended this briefing have already been reported in the Wall Street Journal.”
On top of all that, one of the two Post reporters in the story’s byline, Sari Horwitz, is a known plagiarist. She plagiarized at least two stories during her reporting on the shooting of Rep. Gabby Giffords, Arizona Democrat.
The Post’s executive editor, Marcus Brauchli, did not return TheDC’s request for comment on why he allowed a reporter with a history of plagiarism to use anonymous sources to bash a Republican.
That part of his statement walks through how the Wall Street Journal had already debunked the meme, too. “The April 2010 ATF briefing on weapons smuggling by criminal cartels included a staff member of the Democratic staff of the Oversight Committee who has been working for Ranking Member Cummings on the Fast and Furious investigation,” the part of Hill’s statement to the Post that its reporters ignored read. “This Democratic staff member has never indicated to Republican staff that he had any prior awareness of the gunwalking that took place in Operation Fast and Furious and the recollections of Republican staff who attended this briefing have already been reported in the Wall Street Journal.”
On top of all that, one of the two Post reporters in the story’s byline, Sari Horwitz, is a known plagiarist. She plagiarized at least two stories during her reporting on the shooting of Rep. Gabby Giffords, Arizona Democrat.
The Post’s executive editor, Marcus Brauchli, did not return TheDC’s request for comment on why he allowed a reporter with a history of plagiarism to use anonymous sources to bash a Republican.
Poll: Romney leads Obama in Michigan 46-42
◼ Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney leads President Obama in Michigan, according to a new poll. - The HIll
Michigan is likely a must-win for Obama. He took 57 percent of the vote there in the 2008 presidential race after Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) gave up on the state and pulled out resources a month before the election. But a brutal local economy has hurt Obama with Independents: in the poll, he trails Romney 42 percent to 31 percent with that key group.
Michigan is likely a must-win for Obama. He took 57 percent of the vote there in the 2008 presidential race after Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) gave up on the state and pulled out resources a month before the election. But a brutal local economy has hurt Obama with Independents: in the poll, he trails Romney 42 percent to 31 percent with that key group.
Tuesday, July 19, 2011
BREAKING: House PASSES "Cut, Cap and Balance Act"
◼ The House of Representatives voted 234 to 190 in favor of the "Cut, Cap and Balance Act - The Hill
The House of Representatives voted 234 to 190 in favor of the "Cut, Cap and Balance Act" -- an updated version of the kind of balanced-budget amendment that Republicans have coveted for years -- but which the White House has said will be vetoed in the unlikely event it passes the Senate and reaches President Obama's desk, the Washington Post reports.
The House of Representatives voted 234 to 190 in favor of the "Cut, Cap and Balance Act" -- an updated version of the kind of balanced-budget amendment that Republicans have coveted for years -- but which the White House has said will be vetoed in the unlikely event it passes the Senate and reaches President Obama's desk, the Washington Post reports.
Gang of Six: $1.2 TRILLION IN NEW TAXES (called "revenues")
◼ DEAL: SENATE HUDDLES TO HIKE TAXES... - Reuters via Drudge
◼ Obama praises 'Gang of Six' debt ceiling plan - Politico via Drudge
◼ RESTATES THREAT TO VETO SPENDING CUTS... - AP via Drudge
◼ The Fuzzy Math from Gang of Six - Redstate
◼ READ THE 'Gang of Six' Proposed Debt Reduction Deal
◼ Obama praises 'Gang of Six' debt ceiling plan - Politico via Drudge
◼ RESTATES THREAT TO VETO SPENDING CUTS... - AP via Drudge
◼ The Fuzzy Math from Gang of Six - Redstate
The festive atmosphere at the press conference prompted bearded Marxist Senator Chris Coons to observe that “if Sen. Durbin and Dr. Coburn can both endorse it, this may be just the tough discipline fiscally and the balanced path forward that we need.” So the questions begs, just how can such an ‘austere budget plan’ garner the support of liberal luminaries like Coons and Durbin?◼ Support Growing for Bipartisan Gang Plan - Though Some Express Concern - FOX
The answer is very simple: the budget plan is devoid of a roadmap to achieve the alleged $2.7 trillion in cuts and $1 trillion in revenue gains. Furthermore, the proposal relies upon the passage of some conservative reforms, which if seriously drafted, will never be supported by a majority of the Democrat Caucus, including Gang members like Dick Durbin.
...It looks like these guys never had all the details worked out before they announced their plan. Their sole objective was to eclipse the media attention surrounding the only coherent plan that actually balances the budget – the conservative plan.
Cut, Cap, and Balance – or bust.
◼ READ THE 'Gang of Six' Proposed Debt Reduction Deal
Perry shaping GOP's Iowa race without declaring candidacy
◼ Texas Gov. Rick Perry has not yet committed to a run at the GOP presidential nomination, but his potential candidacy is already shaping the prospects of Republicans in the race as the party prepares for a critical test in Iowa. - Hayley Peterson/Washington Examiner
"[Perry] has the ability to attract from both the Bachmann [supporters] and the Pawlenty [supporters] ... and that's a unique space he fills," Gross said, referring to the two GOP candidates who are expected to do well in Iowa.
The Ames Straw Poll has traditionally been considered a vital test ahead of the crucial Iowa caucuses.
That's why Iowans were aggravated when former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the perceived GOP front-runner, announced that he would skip the Iowa caucuses and instead focus on the first two primary states -- New Hampshire and South Carolina.
With Romney out of the mix, "there's a real vacuum in Iowa for someone of [Perry's] stature, magnitude and fundraising capability," said Republican strategist Matt Mackowiak.
◼ Perry’s people active all over the place - HotAir
As a presidential announcement from Texas Gov. Rick Perry looks ever more likely, his supporters and potential supporters have upped their activity in apparent preparation. Tonight in Austin, for example, a group of top Republican donors will meet to discuss whether they think Perry will be able to garner the support he needs across the country.
"[Perry] has the ability to attract from both the Bachmann [supporters] and the Pawlenty [supporters] ... and that's a unique space he fills," Gross said, referring to the two GOP candidates who are expected to do well in Iowa.
The Ames Straw Poll has traditionally been considered a vital test ahead of the crucial Iowa caucuses.
That's why Iowans were aggravated when former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, the perceived GOP front-runner, announced that he would skip the Iowa caucuses and instead focus on the first two primary states -- New Hampshire and South Carolina.
With Romney out of the mix, "there's a real vacuum in Iowa for someone of [Perry's] stature, magnitude and fundraising capability," said Republican strategist Matt Mackowiak.
◼ Perry’s people active all over the place - HotAir
As a presidential announcement from Texas Gov. Rick Perry looks ever more likely, his supporters and potential supporters have upped their activity in apparent preparation. Tonight in Austin, for example, a group of top Republican donors will meet to discuss whether they think Perry will be able to garner the support he needs across the country.
Ron Paul: "We Will Default Because The Debt Is Unsustainable"
◼ "When a country is indebted to the degree that we’re indebted, the country always defaults. We will default because the debt is unsustainable," Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) said on the House floor today. - Real Clear Politics
"If we don’t understand this, this default will not be because we don't send out the checks. We will send out the checks. It will be defaulted on because people will get their money back, or they will get their Social Security checks and it won't buy anything." Video at the link
"If we don’t understand this, this default will not be because we don't send out the checks. We will send out the checks. It will be defaulted on because people will get their money back, or they will get their Social Security checks and it won't buy anything." Video at the link
Total debt now amounts to 95 percent of gross domestic product. We may already be at the danger point, rather than heading there fast
◼ Things are worse than I said - Michael Barone/Washington Examiner
◼ Federal expansion the real issue in debt ceiling debate. - Michael Barone/Washington Examiner
◼ Federal expansion the real issue in debt ceiling debate. - Michael Barone/Washington Examiner
In Their Own Words: Americans' Views on Raising Debt Ceiling
◼ Why do Americans oppose raising the debt limit? - Conn Carroll/Washington Examiner
◼ Discussion at Lucianne
Gallup has just posted more than 700 open-ended responses from the Americans that they polled who oppose raising the debt limit. These are not canned or prompted responses. They are the real views of average Americans in their own words. The question Gallup asked was: “What are some of the reasons why you would want your member of Congress to vote...◼ In Their Own Words: Americans' Views on Raising Debt Ceiling - Gallup
Page 2 contains the responses of those opposed to raising the debt ceiling and page 3 the responses of those in favor or raising the debt ceiling. Reading through the words average Americans use when asked to discuss their position on the debt ceiling provides a unique and rewarding insight into public opinion on this key issue. (Note: Gallup edited these responses for language.)◼ Poll: Low ratings for Obama, Congress on debt talks - USA Today
◼ Discussion at Lucianne
The next step for Republicans in the debt fight
◼ link - Byron York/Washington Examiner
"Everybody talks about how much the Bush tax cuts cost, and we're saying, no, they led to a huge increase in revenue," says the Republican involved in the fight. It's true. According to historical tables published by the Office of Management and Budget, government revenue shot higher after the Bush tax cuts were enacted. Total federal government receipts rose from $1.782 trillion in 2003 to $2.567 trillion in 2007 -- an increase of $785 billion, or 44 percent. In 2007, the federal deficit shrank to $160 billion -- all after tax cuts that Obama and his Democratic allies portray as disastrous.◼ Sen. Coburn says lawmakers can't put off "grand bargain" debt deal until 2013 - Philip Klein/Washington Examiner
That recent history is at the heart of the conflict between Republicans and Obama over taxes. "The president's view of tax reform is tax increases," says the Republican. "Republicans view tax reform as setting tax rates to maximize economic activity."
While they continue the message war, Republicans are moving the real war to another level. After weeks of useless negotiations with the White House, they're taking the debt issue into their own hands with the passage of cut, cap and balance, in defiance of Obama's veto threat. Republicans know the president and Senate Democrats can stop it, but they believe it's important to stake out their ground.
"Republicans are laying out a starting point with cut, cap and balance," says the Republican. "They're saying to the president, 'We have actually passed something. It's time for you to come up with your proposal.'
"And I'm telling you that the business community in this company is frightened to death of the weird political philosophy of the President of the United States. And until he's gone, everybody's going to be sitting on their thumbs."
◼ Wynn CEO Goes On Epic Anti-Obama Rant On Company Conference Call - Business Insider
◼ I’m saying it bluntly, that this administration is the greatest wet blanket to business, and progress and job creation in my lifetime. - Ed Driscoll at Pajamas Media
“[Obama] has made it harder to establish trust, which will make it harder to find compromise,” Ryan says. “As much as he wants to come off as a leader, every time he talks about Republicans holding out to save fat-cat corporate-jet loopholes — which he knows is false — or leaks alleged spending cuts to the press, he reduces his leadership. He knows how that damages his credibility up here. Yet he continues to spin.”
◼ Paul Ryan: Obama has been “fundamentally un-presidential” - brutallyhonest.org
◼ Ryan Urges ‘United Front’ - National Review Online
◼ Ryan Urges ‘United Front’ - National Review Online
San Francisco To Shutter Courtrooms; Lay Off 200 Workers
◼ The San Francisco Superior Court announced Monday that it's laying off more than 40 percent of its staff and shuttering 25 courtrooms because of budget cuts. - KTVU
Presiding Judge Katherine Feinstein said the actions were necessary to close a $13.75 million budget deficit caused by state budget cuts. She said the cuts mean it will take many more hours to pay a traffic ticket in person, up to 18 months to finalize a divorce and five years for a lawsuit to go to trial.
"The civil justice system in San Francisco is collapsing," Feinstein said.
Presiding Judge Katherine Feinstein said the actions were necessary to close a $13.75 million budget deficit caused by state budget cuts. She said the cuts mean it will take many more hours to pay a traffic ticket in person, up to 18 months to finalize a divorce and five years for a lawsuit to go to trial.
"The civil justice system in San Francisco is collapsing," Feinstein said.
Get Ready for a 70% Marginal Tax Rate
◼ President Obama has been using the debt-ceiling debate and bipartisan calls for deficit reduction to demand higher taxes. With unemployment stuck at 9.2% and a vigorous economic "recovery" appearing more and more elusive, his timing couldn't be worse. - Micheal Boskin/Wall St. Journal
Two problems arise when marginal tax rates are raised. First, as college students learn in Econ 101, higher marginal rates cause real economic harm. The combined marginal rate from all taxes is a vital metric, since it heavily influences incentives in the economy—workers and employers, savers and investors base decisions on after-tax returns. Thus tax rates need to be kept as low as possible, on the broadest possible base, consistent with financing necessary government spending.
Second, as tax rates rise, the tax base shrinks and ultimately, as Art Laffer has long argued, tax rates can become so prohibitive that raising them further reduces revenue—not to mention damaging the economy. That is where U.S. tax rates are headed if we do not control spending soon.
The current top federal rate of 35% is scheduled to rise to 39.6% in 2013 (plus one-to-two points from the phase-out of itemized deductions for singles making above $200,000 and couples earning above $250,000). The payroll tax is 12.4% for Social Security (capped at $106,000), and 2.9% for Medicare (no income cap). While the payroll tax is theoretically split between employers and employees, the employers' share is ultimately shifted to workers in the form of lower wages.
But there are also state income taxes that need to be kept in mind. They contribute to the burden. The top state personal rate in California, for example, is now about 10.5%. Thus the marginal tax rate paid on wages combining all these taxes is 44.1%. (This is a net figure because state income taxes paid are deducted from federal income.)
So, for a family in high-cost California taxed at the top federal rate, the expiration of the Bush tax cuts in 2013, the 0.9% increase in payroll taxes to fund ObamaCare, and the president's proposal to eventually uncap Social Security payroll taxes would lift its combined marginal tax rate to a stunning 58.4%.
But wait, things get worse....
Two problems arise when marginal tax rates are raised. First, as college students learn in Econ 101, higher marginal rates cause real economic harm. The combined marginal rate from all taxes is a vital metric, since it heavily influences incentives in the economy—workers and employers, savers and investors base decisions on after-tax returns. Thus tax rates need to be kept as low as possible, on the broadest possible base, consistent with financing necessary government spending.
Second, as tax rates rise, the tax base shrinks and ultimately, as Art Laffer has long argued, tax rates can become so prohibitive that raising them further reduces revenue—not to mention damaging the economy. That is where U.S. tax rates are headed if we do not control spending soon.
The current top federal rate of 35% is scheduled to rise to 39.6% in 2013 (plus one-to-two points from the phase-out of itemized deductions for singles making above $200,000 and couples earning above $250,000). The payroll tax is 12.4% for Social Security (capped at $106,000), and 2.9% for Medicare (no income cap). While the payroll tax is theoretically split between employers and employees, the employers' share is ultimately shifted to workers in the form of lower wages.
But there are also state income taxes that need to be kept in mind. They contribute to the burden. The top state personal rate in California, for example, is now about 10.5%. Thus the marginal tax rate paid on wages combining all these taxes is 44.1%. (This is a net figure because state income taxes paid are deducted from federal income.)
So, for a family in high-cost California taxed at the top federal rate, the expiration of the Bush tax cuts in 2013, the 0.9% increase in payroll taxes to fund ObamaCare, and the president's proposal to eventually uncap Social Security payroll taxes would lift its combined marginal tax rate to a stunning 58.4%.
But wait, things get worse....
Stop the presses! Michele Bachmann gets migraines!!! UPDATED
◼ Stop the presses! Michele Bachmann gets migraines!!! - neoneocon
◼ Stress-related condition ‘incapacitates’ Bachmann; heavy pill use alleged - Daily Caller
UPDATE: Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann has issued the following statement in response to reports of her experiencing migraines:
“Like nearly 30 million other Americans, I experience migraines that are easily controlled with medication. I am a wife, a mother, a lawyer who worked her way through law school, a former state senator who achieved the repeal of a harmful piece of education policy in Minnesota, and a congresswoman who has worked tirelessly fighting against the expansion of government and wasteful spending.
“Since entering the campaign, I have maintained a full schedule between my duties as a congresswoman and as a presidential candidate traveling across the nation to meet with voters in the key, early primary and caucus states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. I have prescription medication that I take whenever symptoms arise and they keep the migraines under control. Let me be abundantly clear – my ability to function effectively has never been impeded by migraines and will not affect my ability to serve as Commander in Chief.
“The many questions I have received on this subject have allowed me to discuss this important condition that impacts individuals in nearly one in four households. However, as a presidential candidate and office holder, I am focused on performing my job, which has never been more important given the state of our economy and the millions of Americans that are out of work. While I appreciate the concern for me and my health, the greater concern should be the debate that is occurring in Washington over whether or not we will increase our debt, spending and taxes.”
◼ Bachmann: Yes, I experience migraines, but so do 30 million other Americans - HotAir
◼ Bachmann explains her headaches - Hayley Peterson/Washington Examiner
◼ Did Anyone Fact Check Bachmann Hit Piece? I Don't Think So - Dan Riehl/Riehl World View
One of my first thoughts on hearing about the migraine charge against Bachmann is that it’s an affliction far more likely to be suffered by women than men. Indeed, 18 to 25% of women get them. Does that disqualify all of them from office? Or just the Republican ones?◼ A Prediction Comes True? - theothermccain.com
◼ Stress-related condition ‘incapacitates’ Bachmann; heavy pill use alleged - Daily Caller
UPDATE: Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann has issued the following statement in response to reports of her experiencing migraines:
“Like nearly 30 million other Americans, I experience migraines that are easily controlled with medication. I am a wife, a mother, a lawyer who worked her way through law school, a former state senator who achieved the repeal of a harmful piece of education policy in Minnesota, and a congresswoman who has worked tirelessly fighting against the expansion of government and wasteful spending.
“Since entering the campaign, I have maintained a full schedule between my duties as a congresswoman and as a presidential candidate traveling across the nation to meet with voters in the key, early primary and caucus states of Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. I have prescription medication that I take whenever symptoms arise and they keep the migraines under control. Let me be abundantly clear – my ability to function effectively has never been impeded by migraines and will not affect my ability to serve as Commander in Chief.
“The many questions I have received on this subject have allowed me to discuss this important condition that impacts individuals in nearly one in four households. However, as a presidential candidate and office holder, I am focused on performing my job, which has never been more important given the state of our economy and the millions of Americans that are out of work. While I appreciate the concern for me and my health, the greater concern should be the debate that is occurring in Washington over whether or not we will increase our debt, spending and taxes.”
◼ Bachmann: Yes, I experience migraines, but so do 30 million other Americans - HotAir
◼ Bachmann explains her headaches - Hayley Peterson/Washington Examiner
◼ Did Anyone Fact Check Bachmann Hit Piece? I Don't Think So - Dan Riehl/Riehl World View
Monday, July 18, 2011
Obama's default
◼ If the government ends up defaulting on its debt obligations, President Obama will have no one to blame but himself. - Emily Miller/Washington Times
It’s a breath of fresh air to have Congress take the debt issue out of the backrooms of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. and discuss the issue in an open floor debate. The public is behind the concept of a balanced budget and needs to hear the Democrats stubbornly clinging to the tax-and-spend mentality that got us into this problem in the first place. Their position is reckless and indefensible. Cut, Cap and Balance prevents a government shutdown and preserves America’s credit rating. If Mr. Obama follows through with his threat to veto this proposal, the blame for whatever happens next will be on him.
It’s a breath of fresh air to have Congress take the debt issue out of the backrooms of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. and discuss the issue in an open floor debate. The public is behind the concept of a balanced budget and needs to hear the Democrats stubbornly clinging to the tax-and-spend mentality that got us into this problem in the first place. Their position is reckless and indefensible. Cut, Cap and Balance prevents a government shutdown and preserves America’s credit rating. If Mr. Obama follows through with his threat to veto this proposal, the blame for whatever happens next will be on him.
Karen Brooks' letter to Humboldt County Supervisors re: REDISTRICTING
I made some connections with people in Sonoma county who are following the redistricting even closer than myself and just got off the phone.
I spoke about how the northern coastal counties are not happy being linked in with Marin County and even the more urban areas of Sonoma county. The advice I received was to get as many people as possible writing/emailing the commission to remove Marin (and southern Sonoma) from the Congressional and State Senate districts.
Remember Assembly districts are 465,674 people, the new map includes downtown Santa Rosa eliminating Eureka as the largest city of the district. Congressional districts are 702,905 people, the new map goes all the way to Golden Gate Bridge and eliminates Santa Rosa from the majority of Sonoma. The Senate district is 931,349 people, the map goes to SF and includes Santa Rosa.
We know Marin is the bedroom of SF but they have been successful working together, and the commissioners are listening, to link with rural northern calif/somona but not urban SF. Unless we flood the commissioners with comments to remove Marin the maps may not change.
I just wanted to give you feedback that more action than just your letter is needed. Your voices urging the public to make comments will help in the paper, radio and TV. Networking with the boards of Del Norte and Mendocino will also help. The reality of the situation is the that mandatory population of each district requires us to adjoin with counties to our east so we need to identify those counties. Siskiyou, Lake, Glenn and/or Tehama come to mind.
If we want to better control our destiny, and water, we have got to remove Marin from our districts. IN TEN DAYS THE LAST MAPS COME OUT, WE MUST COMMENT NOW. Listed below is the latest press release listing how to respond and the time table.
Thank you for "listening"!
I spoke about how the northern coastal counties are not happy being linked in with Marin County and even the more urban areas of Sonoma county. The advice I received was to get as many people as possible writing/emailing the commission to remove Marin (and southern Sonoma) from the Congressional and State Senate districts.
Remember Assembly districts are 465,674 people, the new map includes downtown Santa Rosa eliminating Eureka as the largest city of the district. Congressional districts are 702,905 people, the new map goes all the way to Golden Gate Bridge and eliminates Santa Rosa from the majority of Sonoma. The Senate district is 931,349 people, the map goes to SF and includes Santa Rosa.
We know Marin is the bedroom of SF but they have been successful working together, and the commissioners are listening, to link with rural northern calif/somona but not urban SF. Unless we flood the commissioners with comments to remove Marin the maps may not change.
I just wanted to give you feedback that more action than just your letter is needed. Your voices urging the public to make comments will help in the paper, radio and TV. Networking with the boards of Del Norte and Mendocino will also help. The reality of the situation is the that mandatory population of each district requires us to adjoin with counties to our east so we need to identify those counties. Siskiyou, Lake, Glenn and/or Tehama come to mind.
If we want to better control our destiny, and water, we have got to remove Marin from our districts. IN TEN DAYS THE LAST MAPS COME OUT, WE MUST COMMENT NOW. Listed below is the latest press release listing how to respond and the time table.
Thank you for "listening"!
Karen Brooks◼ We Draw The Lines, press statement - Sacramento, CA (July 12, 2011)
****
Must watch video at the link
◼ The Progressive Mask Slips - American Thinker
From the comments: But, gee....I thought it was big bad evil Republicans who were anti-collective bargaining union busters? That's the impression you get if you read the papers or watch the news. The word "reporter"needs to be replaced with "spin writer."
From the comments: But, gee....I thought it was big bad evil Republicans who were anti-collective bargaining union busters? That's the impression you get if you read the papers or watch the news. The word "reporter"needs to be replaced with "spin writer."
Perry edges Obama in North Carolina poll
◼ Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry leads Barack Obama 45 percent to 42 percent among North Carolina voters in a potential presidential matchup, according to a new poll released by the Civitas Institute. - HotAir
◼ Perry on prez run, says he's starting to feel "this is what I’ve been called to do" - Philip Klein/Washington Examiner
Should he run, he'd instantly be considered a top tier candidate. Perry's chances hinge on finding a sweet spot between the Tea Party appeal of Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., and the executive experience of former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. He can also tout the strong economic performance of Texas.◼ Rick Perry ‘comfortable’ with idea of presidential run - AP. Boston Herald
Breaking: White House threatens veto of Cut, Cap, and Balance bill
◼ With the House poised to vote on a debt-ceiling increase tomorrow, the White House has released a threat to veto the bill if it reaches the President’s desk. This statement was just released by e-mail, emphasis in the original: - HotAir
The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 2560, the “Cut, Cap and Balance Act of 2011.” Neither setting arbitrary spending levels nor amending the Constitution is necessary to restore fiscal responsibility. Increasing the Federal debt limit, which is needed to avoid a Federal government default on its obligations and a severe blow to the economy, should not be conditioned on taking these actions. Instead of pursuing an empty political statement and unrealistic policy goals, it is necessary to move beyond politics as usual and find bipartisan common ground.
The bill would undercut the Federal Government’s ability to meet its core commitments to seniors, middle-class families and the most vulnerable, while reducing our ability to invest in our future. H. R. 2560 would set unrealistic spending caps that could result in significant cuts to education, research and development, and other programs critical to growing our economy and winning the future. It could also lead to severe cuts in Medicare and Social Security, which are growing to accommodate the retirement of the baby boomers, and put at risk the retirement security for tens of millions of Americans.
Furthermore, H. R. 2560 could require even deeper cuts, since it conditions an increase in the Federal debt limit on Congressional passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment. H. R. 2560 sets out a false and unacceptable choice between the Federal Government defaulting on its obligations now or, alternatively, passing a Balanced Budget Amendment that, in the years ahead, will likely leave the Nation unable to meet its core commitment of ensuring dignity in retirement.
The President has proposed a comprehensive and balanced framework that ensures we live within our means and reduces the deficit by $4 trillion, while supporting economic growth and long-term job creation, protecting critical investments, and meeting the commitments made to provide economic security to Americans no matter their circumstances. H.R. 2560 is inconsistent with this responsible framework to restore fiscal responsibility and is not an appropriate method of reducing the Nation’s deficits and debt. The Administration is committed to working with the Congress on a bipartisan basis to achieve real solutions.
If the President were presented this bill for signature, he would veto it.
◼ Obama officially threatens to veto 'Cut, Cap and Balance' - The Hill
The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 2560, the “Cut, Cap and Balance Act of 2011.” Neither setting arbitrary spending levels nor amending the Constitution is necessary to restore fiscal responsibility. Increasing the Federal debt limit, which is needed to avoid a Federal government default on its obligations and a severe blow to the economy, should not be conditioned on taking these actions. Instead of pursuing an empty political statement and unrealistic policy goals, it is necessary to move beyond politics as usual and find bipartisan common ground.
The bill would undercut the Federal Government’s ability to meet its core commitments to seniors, middle-class families and the most vulnerable, while reducing our ability to invest in our future. H. R. 2560 would set unrealistic spending caps that could result in significant cuts to education, research and development, and other programs critical to growing our economy and winning the future. It could also lead to severe cuts in Medicare and Social Security, which are growing to accommodate the retirement of the baby boomers, and put at risk the retirement security for tens of millions of Americans.
Furthermore, H. R. 2560 could require even deeper cuts, since it conditions an increase in the Federal debt limit on Congressional passage of a Balanced Budget Amendment. H. R. 2560 sets out a false and unacceptable choice between the Federal Government defaulting on its obligations now or, alternatively, passing a Balanced Budget Amendment that, in the years ahead, will likely leave the Nation unable to meet its core commitment of ensuring dignity in retirement.
The President has proposed a comprehensive and balanced framework that ensures we live within our means and reduces the deficit by $4 trillion, while supporting economic growth and long-term job creation, protecting critical investments, and meeting the commitments made to provide economic security to Americans no matter their circumstances. H.R. 2560 is inconsistent with this responsible framework to restore fiscal responsibility and is not an appropriate method of reducing the Nation’s deficits and debt. The Administration is committed to working with the Congress on a bipartisan basis to achieve real solutions.
If the President were presented this bill for signature, he would veto it.
◼ Obama officially threatens to veto 'Cut, Cap and Balance' - The Hill
Federal expansion the real issue in debt ceiling debate
◼ It's hard to keep up with all the arguments and proposals in the debt limit struggle. But what's at stake is fundamental. - Michael Barone/Washington Examiner
◼ Spengler on the Debt Ceiling - Stanley Kurtz/National Review Online
◼ Nick Gillespie's three reasons the debt-ceiling debate is full of malarkey - Mark Tapscott/Washington Examiner
◼ Obama's 2012 prospects tied to debt ceiling deal - Brian Hughes/Washington Examiner
The bedrock issue is whether we should have a larger and more expensive federal government. Over many years federal spending has averaged about 20 percent of gross domestic product.◼ Presidential flummery andquestions left unasked - Hugh Hewitt/Washington Examiner
Bravo, Jake Tapper.There’s a Reason We Have a Debt Ceiling - Jonathan S. Tobin/Commentary Magazine via Lucianne
Finally from a member of the increasingly supine White House press corps came a question that demanded of the president specificity as to his alleged willingness to "upset his base."
Tapper asked the president on Friday to "tell us one structural reform that you are willing to make to one of these entitlement programs that would have a major impact on the deficit?"
The president spoke a long time in response but provided no such specificity about even one such reform, revealing again that the would-be Emperor of the Big Deal has no plan beyond a political operation to assign blame for any unpleasant consequences of a collision with the existing debt ceiling.
◼ Spengler on the Debt Ceiling - Stanley Kurtz/National Review Online
The redoubtable Spengler of the Asia Times (channeled by David Goldman), offers a sobering and entirely plausible scenario showing how Obama could take advantage of the debt ceiling battle to undercut the Tea Party and the Republicans, stoke class warfare, secure re-election, and get the banks to fund his favored projects to boot. Spengler is a fan of the Tea Party, but thinks the McConnell plan as the best way to prevent Obama from off-loading the onus of the bad economy onto the Republicans. Whatever you think of the debt ceiling quandary, Spengler’s case is worth a look.◼ Disregard what pols are saying about the debt debate - Jennifer Rubin at the Washington Post
◼ Nick Gillespie's three reasons the debt-ceiling debate is full of malarkey - Mark Tapscott/Washington Examiner
◼ Obama's 2012 prospects tied to debt ceiling deal - Brian Hughes/Washington Examiner
Nikki Haley: "You have to cut your spending, you have to cap where you are going to be, and you have to balance that budget. All the states are doing this - DC can do this as well, if they want to."
◼ Governors gag over D.C. dysfunction - Politico
In the eyes of America’s governors, Washington D.C. has hit a new low.State executives have long vented about the shortcomings of the Beltway mindset, carping that the federal government is too partisan, too fiscally irresponsible and out of touch with the citizens back home. Now, those complaints have evolved into deep frustration, verging on contempt, thanks to a stalled debate over the federal debt ceiling that caps off months of partisan dysfunction in Congress.
◼ Many states celebrate surpluses as Congress struggles with debt - Washington Times
“We’ve been able to cut taxes, improve [and] reform government. And you know why? We looked [the fiscal problems] square in the eye. … That is what they’re not doing here in D.C. right now.”
Sunday, July 17, 2011
Paul Ryan: Setting the Record Straight $6.31 trillion to $9.75 trillion
◼ A BRIEF HISTORY OF PRESIDENT OBAMA’S FISCAL RECORD
Despite newfound concern with the debt overhang stifling economic growth, President Obama’s record falls far short of his rhetoric. Let’s review the decisions made by President Obama and Congressional Democrats over the past couple of years, and the disappointing results of their policy choices:
January 20, 2009 - President Obama sworn into office
President tells the American people in his Inaugural Address: “Those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to account, to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day, because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.”
Debt Held By Public = $6.31 trillionFebruary 17, 2009 President Signs into Law the Spending Stimulus
The stimulus adds $821 billion in new spending according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
The White House promises this infusion of spending and borrowing would keep unemployment rate below 8%. As millions of Americans are painfully aware, that promise was broken.
Debt Held by Public = $6.48 trillionFebruary 26, 2009 President Issues FY2010 Budget
The President’s budget adds $2.7 trillion in new debt in FY2010 and imposes $1.4 trillion in new taxes.
Debt Held by Public = $6.58 trillionMarch 11, 2009 President Signs FY2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act
The massive spending bill includes 8,696 earmarks at a cost of $11 billion.
The spending bill adds $19 billion in new spending above the baseline – an 8.6% spending increase.
Debt Held by Public = $6.66 trillionApril 29, 2009 Congressional Democrats Pass FY2010 Budget
The Congressional Democrats’ budget calls for a $2 trillion debt increase in 2010, and another 8.9% increase in non-defense discretionary spending.
The reconciliation process is abused to later pave the way for health care overhaul to be jammed into law.
Of note: this is the last time Congressional Democrats will bother budgeting.
Debt Held by Public = $6.85 trillionFebruary 2, 2010 President Issues FY2011 Budget
The President’s budget more than doubles the debt; pushes the FY2011 deficit to a new record of $1.6 trillion; drives spending to a new record of $3.8 trillion in fiscal year 2011; and raises taxes by more than $2 trillion through 2020, under the administration’s own estimates.
Debt Held by Public = $7.85 trillionMarch 23, 2010 President Signs Health-Care Overhaul Into Law
The massive new law adds$1.4 trillion in new spending over the next decade, and over $2.5 trillion once the law is fully implemented.
Despite sluggish economic growth and high unemployment, the law imposes over $500 billion in new tax hikes. CBO Director Elmendorf would later testify that the law would reduce employment by roughly half a percent – a reduction of approximately 800,000 jobs.
Debt Held by Public = $8.18 trillionApril 15, 2010 Congressional Democrats Decide Not to Do a Budget for FY2011
The 1974 Budget Act requires Congress to pass a budget each year by April 15.
In an unprecedented budget failure, House Democrats not only failed to pass a budget – they opted to not even propose a budget.
Debt Held by Public = $8.39 trillionJuly 21, 2010 President Signs Financial Regulatory Overhaul Into Law
In addition to heightened regulatory uncertainty, the massive new law adds $10.2 billion in new spending.
Debt Held by Public = $8.69 trillionFebruary 14, 2011 President Issues FY2012 Budget
The President’s budget yet again calls for the doubling of the debt in five years, and tripling the debt in ten years.
The President’s budget spends $47 trillion over the next decade, imposes over $1 trillion in new tax hikes, and fails to address the drivers of the debt.
Debt Held by Public = $9.45 trillionApril 13, 2011 President Delivers Speech on Deficit Reduction
The President appears to abandon his own budget by offering a ‘framework’ that calls for additional tax increases, defense spending cuts, and Medicare price controls – yet lacks sufficient detail to back-up claims of deficit reduction.
Debt Held by Public = $9.65 trillionApril 15, 2011 House Passes FY2012 Budget Resolution
The House-passed budget cuts $6.2 trillion in government spending over the next decade, saves Medicare, strengthens the social safety net, lifts the crushing burden of debt, and spurs economic growth and job creation.
Senate Democrats fail to meet their legal requirement to pass a budget by April 15.
Debt Held by Public = $9.68 trillionApril 18, 2011 S&P Issues Credit Warning on U.S. Debt
The rating agency sets off the latest alarm bells, warning of lawmakers of unsustainable fiscal course.
President Obama has still not proposed a credible budget; Senate Democrats have still not proposed any budget.
Debt Held by Public = $9.68 trillionMay 13, 2011 Medicare and Social Security Trustees Issue Warning of Looming Insolvency
According to the programs’ own trustees, the unsustainable future of Medicare and Social Security threatens the health and retirement security of America’s seniors.
President Obama and Congressional Democrats continue to engage in a partisan campaign to attack efforts to save and strengthen these critical programs – while offering no serious solutions of their own.
Debt Held by Public = $9.67 trillionMay 25, 2011 reveals the bankruptcy of Senate Democrats’ ideas.
Senate Democrats have still not proposed any budget.
Debt Held by Public = $9.72 trillionJune 23, 2011 CBO Director Further Discredits President’s Fiscal Record
In testimony before the House Budget Committee, CBO Director Doug Elmendorf responds to questions on the President’s ‘Framework’: “We don’t estimate speeches. We need much more specificity than was provided in that speech for us to do our analysis.”
Debt Held by Public = $9.74 trillionJuly 8, 2011 Unemployment Hits 9.2%; Day 800 Since Senate Democrats Last Passed A Budget
A devastating jobs report that shows the unemployment rate at 9.2% coincides with the 800th day since Senate Democrats last thought the federal government needed a budget.
Debt Held by Public = $9.75 trillionJuly 11, 2011 Senator Conrad Gives Budget Speech on Senate Floor
On Day 803 since the Senate last passed a budget, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad takes to the Senate floor to deliver a speech about the Senate Democrats’ non-existent budget resolution.
Senator Conrad makes the case for imposing over $2 trillion in new taxes, but provides no actual budget resolution and no credible details.
Debt held by Public = $9.75 trillionJuly 15, 2011 President Holds Press Conference: “We’re Running Out of Time” to Deal with Debt
President Obama tells reporters: “I've got reams of paper and printouts and spreadsheets on my desk, and so we know how we can create a package that solves the deficits and debt for a significant period of time. But in order to do that, we got to get started now.”
The American people have still not seen any “paper” or “printouts” of what specific spending cuts the President supports. The American people have still not seen any “spreadsheets” from the White House to corroborate their claims of having offered a deficit reduction plan.
While it’s long past time for Washington “to get started now” on tackling our debt problems, President Obama has still not proposed a credible budget, and Senate Democrats have still not proposed any budget.
Debt Held by Public = $9.75 trillion
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)