Clinton email headache is about to get worse: https://t.co/VKZ6ps9Iqs pic.twitter.com/XvxSDFut9S
— The Hill (@thehill) May 28, 2016
....Clinton’s allies attempted to paint the office as partisan in the weeks ahead of the report’s release, but the effort failed to leave a lasting impact.
For months, Clinton and her team have failed to offer a convincing explanation for the use of the private server, and she has steadfastly refused to apologize.
“I thought it was allowed,” she said in an interview on CNN’s “The Situation Room” this week, after the watchdog’s report became public. “I knew past secretaries of state used personal email.
“It was still a mistake. If I could go back, I'd do it differently,” she said.
Clinton and many of her top aides declined to take part in the inspector general’s probe. But they won’t have that option going forward.
On Friday, Clinton’s former chief of staff Cheryl Mills was interviewed behind closed doors as part of a court case launched by conservative watchdog Judicial Watch. In coming weeks, longtime aide Huma Abedin, former IT specialist Bryan Pagliano and other officials are scheduled to answer questions under oath for sessions that could last as long as seven hours.
A federal judge this week preemptively blocked Judicial Watch from releasing videotapes of the upcoming depositions.
But the group this week released the transcript from its first interview, with longtime State Department veteran Lewis Lukens. And it plans to do the same thing following each of the upcoming depositions, providing fodder for weeks to come from some of the closest rings of Clinton’s inner circle.
The court has said that Clinton herself may be forced to answer questions under oath, which would dramatically escalate the brouhaha surrounding the case.
At some point in the next month, the House Select Committee on Benghazi is also set to release its long-awaited report about the 2012 terror attack, which has been linked to Clinton....
FEELING THE FAKE BERN> @SenSanders shows doesn’t want to be POTUS bc scared to discuss @HillaryClinton emails. https://t.co/e37upPDd9E
— Roger Simon (@rogerlsimon) May 28, 2016
.@JonahNRO: Why Both Clintons Are Such Unapologetic Liars https://t.co/AhAMtogPtG
— Fox Nation (@foxnation) May 28, 2016
Why @HillaryClinton's lies are scarier than Trump's: https://t.co/tOoY4ZkOLy pic.twitter.com/IEOYQ1Tkdl
— National Review (@NRO) May 27, 2016
An independent watchdog revealed that Secretary Clinton 'did not comply' with federal records law. ↓ https://t.co/elfAX4R7ZQ
— Paul Ryan (@SpeakerRyan) May 28, 2016
Clinton has been burying emails since she was First Lady https://t.co/FyOGlJgrlp via @nypost
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) May 29, 2016
While the State Department’s own internal probe found former Secretary Hillary Clinton violated federal recordkeeping laws, it’s not the first time she and her top aides shielded her e-mail from public disclosure while serving in a government position.
As first lady, Hillary was embroiled in another scheme to bury sensitive White House e-mails, known internally as “Project X.”
In 1999, as investigators looked into Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate and other scandals involving the then-first lady, it was discovered that more than 1 million subpoenaed e-mails were mysteriously “lost” due to a “glitch” in a West Wing computer server.
The massive hole in White House archives covered a critical two-year period — 1996 to 1998 — when Republicans and special prosecutor Ken Starr were subpoenaing White House e-mails.
Despite separate congressional investigations and a federal lawsuit over Project X, high-level e-mails dealing with several scandals were never turned over. And the full scope of Bill and Hillary Clintons’ culpability in the parade of scandals was never known.
To those well-versed in Clinton shenanigans, this all sounds distressingly familiar....
GOP chairman: Clinton's private email could have played role in Russian invasions https://t.co/FwkaK09pJo pic.twitter.com/0FM7KHqrbP
— The Hill (@thehill) May 29, 2016