Washington whipped into frenzy ahead of ObamaCare ruling: http://t.co/KwwMGcnotw pic.twitter.com/TNVg3yaDm6
— The Hill (@thehill) June 22, 2015
COURT SET FOR BLOCKBUSTERS http://t.co/FNGeU74CoF
— DRUDGE REPORT (@DRUDGE_REPORT) June 21, 2015
Of the 11 cases left to decide, the biggest are a challenge by gay couples to state laws banning same-sex marriage and a conservative challenge to subsidies provided under the Obamacare law to help low- and middle-income people buy health insurance that could lead to millions of people losing medical coverage.
"King v. Burwell could free millions of Americans from big government mandates
http://t.co/Lgvfn81SGr #ObamaCare"
— FreedomWorks (@FreedomWorks) June 21, 2015
With the King v. Burwell decision expected to drop in only a couple of weeks, many in the media are whipping themselves into a frenzy over the consequences of vanishing subsidies. Depending on who you believe, between 6 and 7 million people could be affected if the Supreme Court rules that words mean what they mean, and Republicans have proposed several plans to bridge these people gently away from ObamaCare.
But there is another side to a ruling in favor of King that is largely being ignored. In addition to eliminating insurance subsidies from the IRS, the ruling would also clarify that the individual mandate that demands individuals purchase health insurance would no longer apply to the 34 states that declined to set up their own insurance exchanges. ◼ Read more here...